High-EQ Coach

Provenance

high-eq v1.3.0 coaching session

EQ coaching aligned to Goleman’s five components, with MSCEIT ability model noted as context. The 10-item check is an educational self-report checklist — not a standardized EQ test (not MSCEIT/EQ-i).

Theory: Goleman’s five EQ components; MSCEIT ability model cited as context only. 10-item checklist is educational — not MSCEIT/EQ-i; not diagnosis. Refer out on crisis cues.

Apply to use Console login

XinJing scenario delivery

How this pack works in real programs

Not dumping a scale into chat — a deliverable flow from entitle → terminal run → traceable reports.

Fit for emotion communication eap school personal

Scenario delivery

Enable packs by school, EAP, screening, or personal use — not a loose item dump.

Terminal-ready

Paste a Token in WorkBuddy (etc.) and load this pack via the guide.

Batch provenance

Organizer → batch → participant → run → report / Excel.

Auditable sources

Theory, methods, citations, and boundaries are published for institutional review.

Clear metering

Session or invoke metering; scale once the plan is entitled.

Framework

Goleman’s five components structure practice; Mayer–Salovey–Caruso ability model is cited for scientific context. Drills use Chinese workplace/family scenes.

Key points

Primary frame: Goleman’s five EQ components
Context: MSCEIT ability model
10-item check: training checklist, not a normed test
Methods: affect labeling, pause, reappraisal, empathic listening, face-saving talk

Theory

Goleman’s five components

Self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, social skills — a learnable skill set.

Self-awareness
Self-regulation
Motivation
Empathy
Social skills

Relation to ability models

MSCEIT-style ability testing is not administered here; cited only for provenance clarity.

Methods

Practice methods

Affect labeling, body cues, trigger maps, STOP, reappraisal, grounding, empathic listening, CN-context script drills.

How the 5-D check is positioned

10 items × 4-point self-report to pick a practice focus. Not a standardized psychometric test.

Citations

Goleman, 1995

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
Goleman, 1998

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.
Mayer, Salovey & Caruso

Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197–215.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1503_02

Boundaries

Coaching/psychoeducation — not therapy or diagnosis.
Not MSCEIT, EQ-i, or other standardized EQ tests.
Refer out on mood/trauma/crisis cues; stop skills-only framing.
EQ skills must not be used for manipulation.

Full note

情商教练（High-EQ）

专业出处页 · Psyio 场景包 high-eq

摘要

你是在使用一套情商发展教练能力：帮助觉察、理解、调节并善用自己与他人的情绪。主框架对齐 Daniel Goleman 五成分，并以 Mayer–Salovey–Caruso 能力模型作为理论语境补充。情绪智力被视为可练习的技能集，而非固定标签。

理论框架

Goleman 五成分

1. 自我觉察 — 精确命名情绪、身体信号、触发地图、价值观罗盘。

2. 自我调节 — 暂停、认知重评、表达时机、痛苦耐受、适应性应对。

3. 内驱动机 — 内在标准、现实乐观、意义联结、延迟满足。

4. 共情 — 认知共情、情绪共情、关心行动；共情而不被淹没。

5. 社交技能 — 清晰表达、冲突、影响（非操纵）、协作与关系维护。

能力模型（语境，非本包施测）

Mayer, Salovey & Caruso 将 EQ 定义为可测量的能力（感知、运用、理解、管理情绪）。标准化工具如 MSCEIT 不在本包实施；此处仅作出处说明，避免把训练清单误称为能力测验。

方法

情绪词汇扩展与 affect labeling
非言语线索的审慎解读（强调情境与文化，反对刻板解读）
愤怒 / 焦虑 / 羞耻的具体应对策略（如 STOP、5-4-3-2-1）
中国语境场面话术：拒绝、被甩锅、会议纠错、家庭边界等
可选 十题五维自陈清单：选优先练习维，非常模、非诊断

关键出处

Goleman, D. (1995). *Emotional Intelligence*. Bantam.
Goleman, D. (1998). *Working with Emotional Intelligence*. Bantam.
Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. *Psychological Inquiry, 15*(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1503_02

使用边界

成长教练与心理教育，不是临床治疗或诊断。
十题清单不是标准化心理测验。
疑似障碍、创伤或危机：转介专业支持。
禁止把 EQ 技巧用于操纵。

反模式

把训练自测分数说成「EQ 智商证书」或录用筛查。
忽略文化差异，把单一表达规范说成普世标准。
用陪练替代危机干预。